FCCMATRIX, INC.
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • GIVING
    • SPECIALTY PLATES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • GIVING
    • SPECIALTY PLATES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
Search

Donors Were Asked What Charity They’d Support if They Could Pick Only One. Half Chose the Same 20 Groups. Michael Towner, Iconic Legacy.

9/13/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
When donors are asked what charity they would support if they could give to just one, 54% selected one of only 20 organizations, according to a new study.
 
​The findings show that a small number of national and international groups hold a privileged place in the philanthropy of American donors.
 
Even though they were not prompted with a list of charities to choose from, the respondents most often picked a brand-name group such as the American Humane Society, Doctors Without Borders, Feeding America, Goodwill Industries, Planned Parenthood, the United Way, and Wounded Warrior Project.
 
Among the 20 were five that were particularly popular. Thirty-six percent of donors picked one the following: Alsac/St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, the American Cancer Society, American Red Cross, Salvation Army, or Unicef.
 
Donors preferred large organizations, underscoring the challenges small charities face from well-resourced competitors. Only 23% picked a favorite charity with annual revenue of $50 million or less; only 5% picked one with revenue of $1 million or less. 38% picked a charity with annual revenue of $1 billion or more.
 
The favorite charities cited by donors had a median annual revenue — including donations, government support, and earned income — of $399 million.
 
A bright spot for small organizations: The top donors, those who gave $2,000 or more during the 12 months preceding the survey, were most likely to pick a favorite charity with revenue under $50 million.
 
Donors overwhelmingly favored organizations that work globally, as opposed to those that work exclusively stateside: 60% of donors chose a favorite charity that supports programs internationally. However, only 2% picked a nonprofit that works exclusively overseas. Political conservatives, parents with children at home, and Christians were most likely to favor global charities.
 
By cause, health-related charities were the most commonly picked as favorites, cited by nearly one in three donors.
 
Among other findings:
 
Impact matters. The three most commonly cited reasons for selecting a particular charity as a favorite were the organization’s results (32%), the donor’s trust (28%), and the donor’s personal connection to the cause or charity (22%).
 
Overhead spending doesn’t matter so much. Eight-four percent of donors picked a charity that spends 10 to 29 % of revenue on administrative costs, according to that charity’s informational tax forms. The average "overhead ratio" for the charities donors favored was just under 19%. But only 12% of donors said that using their money efficiently was the key factor in why they picked their favorite charity, and a February report by the same researchers discovered a charity’s spending on administrative costs had little impact on giving.
 
Religion’s influence is muted. 82% of people who attend religious services at least monthly picked a favorite charity that was not faith-based.

​Michael Towner

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    BLOG

    Picture

    Archives

    January 2025
    October 2024
    July 2024
    January 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    June 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018

    Categories

    All
    Arizona
    Australia
    California
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    ECommerce
    Environment
    Florida
    Food Banks
    Fundraising
    Hawaii
    Hunger
    Idaho
    Iowa
    Louisiana
    Marine Mammals
    Marketing
    Massachusetts
    Music
    Nevada
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    New York
    Oklahoma
    Philanthropy
    Politics
    South Carolina
    Specialty License Plates
    Sport
    Technology
    Texas
    United Kingdom
    Virginia
    Washington

© 2025 Nil Satis Nisi Optimum, Inc
"There can be no change without chaos."

www.FCCMATRIX.com

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • GIVING
    • SPECIALTY PLATES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT